DMRG sweep problems

How do I use this algorithm? What does that parameter do?
Post Reply
lww
Posts: 10
Joined: 09 Jan 2019, 13:27

DMRG sweep problems

Post by lww »

I recently did some calculations on fractional Chern insulator in infinite cylinder following arXiv:1208.2623 and noticed a recurrent sweep problem in iDMRG. Instead of gradually converging to ground state, the sweep process seems to jump between two distinct states as shown below. This sometimes happens when I add interactions or set Nmax>1. I'm not sure why this happens and how can I solve this optimization problem? I really hope you can give me some advice :D
sweep_E_S_Ly8_chi1000.dat.png
sweep_E_S_Ly8_chi1000.dat.png (48.42 KiB) Viewed 5700 times
Leon
Posts: 13
Joined: 23 Jul 2018, 09:08
Location: University of Kent

Re: DMRG sweep problems

Post by Leon »

Problems with convergence could be due to a setup that is badly suited to DMRG. For example, in arXiv:1407.6985, convergence is bad for a weakly interacting system (which is in a metallic phase).

That said, the behaviour you report seems different from the case I mention. Did you try using a mixer?
lww
Posts: 10
Joined: 09 Jan 2019, 13:27

Re: DMRG sweep problems

Post by lww »

I'll try adding a mixer to see whether it works. This also happens when the system setup is surely in FCI phase, so I suspect that I miss some parameter tweaks in tenpy. You once mentioned that arXiv:1407.6985 used an old version of tenpy, could you provide a link to the code? Thanks.
bart
Posts: 26
Joined: 23 Jan 2019, 09:35

Re: DMRG sweep problems

Post by bart »

I am also having convergence problems getting the FCI phase from arxiv:1407.6985. I have tried it for bosons, every permutation of the initial product state, different system sizes, with/without mixer, etc. Without interaction everything works fine for me, and I get the same figures as in the paper (Fig 2.a,b). Since the parameters for the FCI case are clearly specified in the paper, and it was done using a previous version of TeNPy, surely it should just work when interactions are turned on... :?: I too would really appreciate an answer to this!
Leon
Posts: 13
Joined: 23 Jul 2018, 09:08
Location: University of Kent

Re: DMRG sweep problems

Post by Leon »

lww wrote: 14 Jun 2019, 01:50 You once mentioned that arXiv:1407.6985 used an old version of tenpy, could you provide a link to the code? Thanks.
Unfortunately, that version is not open source, so I cannot give you a link.

There is a possibility this problem with convergence is caused by some issue deep in DMRG, which does not behave like we expect. If the local optimization for the two-site problem finds a state that is highly entangled, the subsequent SVD will raise the energy. This would be consistent with the plots you showed earlier.

I am doing some testing to see if this is indeed the case, and if so, how to resolve it. I hope to discuss this with Johannes as well.
User avatar
Johannes
Site Admin
Posts: 413
Joined: 21 Jul 2018, 12:52
Location: TU Munich

Re: DMRG sweep problems

Post by Johannes »

This jumping sure looks very wrong and strange. Any chance you could provide a simple example code where this happens?
Do you expect a (nearly) degenerate ground state in this case? Than it might just be jumping around between different solutions.
It might help to use 'chi_list' to gradually increase chi, such that the environments pin-point the state you use.

Also I'd recommend to play around with the 'update_env' parameter and the geometry of the system, i.e. the number of rings 'Lx' in your model geometry.
I had the case that the system tried to dimerize bonds, such that a single ring wasn't enough.
It might also be that the Single-Site DMRG which [mention]Leon[/mention] is writing right now is better suited. I hope we can merge it into the master branch very soon.
Post Reply