Search found 429 matches
- 27 Aug 2018, 11:22
- Forum: Implementations
- Topic: MultiCouplingModel and Toric Code as example
- Replies: 7
- Views: 25861
Re: MultiCouplingModel and Toric Code as example
You're right, L_x is just the number of "rings" of the cylinder included into the MPS unit cell. I agree that the energy per site shouldn't depend on L_x, so it's a bad sign if it does, there's probably something wrong then
- 27 Aug 2018, 11:18
- Forum: HowTos and FAQ for TeNPy
- Topic: Different coupling terms on different sites
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10811
Re: Different coupling terms on different sites
To answer first in general (That's the perfect place to ask this ;-)): If you give the strength parameter to add_coupling , it is tiled to the "correct" size of the couplings. You are right, for onsite terms in add_onsite , this is simply the Ls of the lattice. Now what is the "correc...
- 23 Aug 2018, 15:56
- Forum: Implementations
- Topic: MultiCouplingModel and Toric Code as example
- Replies: 7
- Views: 25861
MultiCouplingModel and Toric Code as example
Since I've recently added the MultiCouplingModel , it's time to add a simple model actually using it. I think the exactly solvable toric code is a good example, so here is my implementation: """Kitaev's exactly solvable toric code model. As we put the model on a cylinder, the name &qu...
- 22 Jul 2018, 23:16
- Forum: Other News
- Topic: We got a forum!
- Replies: 0
- Views: 19676
We got a forum!
It's a bit wired to make the announcement that I've set up this forum in this forum, but I guess that's the first thing to announce to the world once this forum is set up
Anyways, I'm awaiting your questions, suggestions and contributions. Happy posting!
Anyways, I'm awaiting your questions, suggestions and contributions. Happy posting!